Travel back to the fifteenth century and, remarkably, you will find that Italy did not exist. Instead, there existed a patchwork of city-states, each sealed behind gates at sundown.
While modern-day Italy hums with the buzz of Vespas and carries the aroma of roasted espresso, fifteenth-century Italy clattered with the sound of iron-shod hooves and smelled faintly of damp stone from rising cathedrals. This was the world of walled cities and sacred shadows into which the artists Giovanni Bellini and Pietro Perugino were born. They were not merely ‘artists’ in the modern sense. Rather, they created sacred images in an era where it was believed that these images could heal the sick and save souls. From the canals of Venice, where Bellini captured the quiet grief of the Pietà, to the hilltop fortifications of Perugia, where Perugino painted his Man of Sorrows for the city’s ruling magistrates – these masterpieces let medieval viewers see themselves reflected in the vulnerable human face of the divine.
Step through the doors of the Morgan Library & Museum, and the noise of Midtown Manhattan gives way to quiet marble corridors. Visitors to the historic part of the building first encounter The East Room, with towering walnut bookcases filled with thousands of leather-bound volumes, painted ceilings glowing with gold and deep reds, and narrow balconies circling the upper walls. If visitors leave the East Room and cross through the Rotunda, they will reach Pierpont Morgan’s Study, which is tucked deep inside the building.
Here, in a special exhibition through Sunday, April 19th, 2026, Bellini’s restored Pietà and Perugino’s Man of Sorrows hang side by side as evocative reminders of a world that once used art to touch the divine. These paintings are displayed in J. Pierpont Morgan’s Study, alongside other Renaissance paintings from his collection, which includes works by Perugino along with several sculptures. The Pietà by Giovanni Bellini is on view for the very first time in the United States and is on loan from the Museo della Città in Rimini, The Man of Sorrows by Pietro Perugino is on loan from the Galleria Nazionale dell’Umbria, Perugia. Inside Pierpont Morgan’s Study, the noise of the city fades, replaced by the hushed, sacred presence of these two painting.
During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, painting was the center of civic and spiritual life. Then, the Italian peninsula was divided into rival city-states that competed not only through trade and warfare, but also through visual splendor. Churches, confraternities, and governing bodies commissioned sacred images in order to assert authority and demonstrate devotion. At the same time, the Renaissance was transforming how artists understood the human body and the natural world. Painters began studying anatomy, light, and perspective, moving away from flat gold backgrounds toward emotional realism. Religious subjects did not disappear; instead, they were painted in such a way that the viewer could feel closer to the image, in a sense. Christ was no longer a distant symbol suspended in gold; rather, he was rendered as a real person, with flesh and veins, and visibly suffering. In this climate of political ambition, spiritual urgency, and artistic innovation, paintings such as the Pietà and the Man of Sorrows carried both devotional power and public meaning. They offer a unique perspective on human suffering, divine presence, and the evolving style of Renaissance art.
Pietà by Giovanni Bellini

To understand Pietà, one must first understand the man who revolutionized the Venetian Renaissance. Giovanni Bellini (circa 1430–1516 C.E.) was born into a dynasty of artists, but he pushed beyond the stylized, gold-plated traditions that dominated earlier religious imagery. Instead of presenting sacred figures as distant icons, Bellini painted bodies that felt physical and present. Skin has weight. Veins show beneath the surface. Dirt clings to the folds of garments. Emotion appears in subtle expressions rather than dramatic imagery.
Painted around the 1470s, Pietà captures the moment just after Christ’s body had been removed from the cross. Three angels gently struggle to support the weight of the corpse. Their small hands wrap around Christ’s arm as his body leans towards the viewer. A single drop of blood slides down his forearm. The effect is unsettlingly intimate.
The painting was originally meant for private devotion. According to the exhibition’s curator, Dr. John Marciari, the Charles W. Engelhard Curator and Head of the Department of Drawings and Prints at the Morgan, the earliest record of the work appears in the hands of the Malatesta family in Rimini for their private collection. “It was imagined as a kind of devotional image,” Marciari explained, “Like having a crucifix on the wall. It was there to encourage reflection on the mystery of the crucifixion.”
Bellini achieves this not through spectacle but through modest realism. The angels are not triumphant heavenly figures but soft, almost childlike attendants who subtly frame the scene. They hold Christ carefully, as if worried that his body might slip from their grasp. Their expressions are calm rather than anguished, creating a sense of suspended time. A French and Italian teacher and former A.P. Art History teacher at the Bronx High School of Science, Mr. Walter Giorgis-Blessent notes how this realism marks an important moment in Renaissance painting. Earlier religious works often placed holy figures against flat gold backgrounds, emphasizing divine distance. Bellini instead brings Christ down to the viewer’s level. “You feel very connected to it,” Giorgis-Blessent said. “Christ is sitting on a stone toward us, almost like a stage. The angels stop the body from sliding forward. It all feels very human.”
That humanity is what continues to captivate viewers centuries later. Standing in front of the painting today, it is easy to forget that it was once meant to inspire prayer. Today, the viewer notices the craft: the delicate brushwork, the careful depiction of the anatomy, and the ways in which Bellini uses light in order to model the body. Yet the emotional power remains intact. Bellini’s Christ is not distant, idealized, or perfect. He is heavy, wounded, and unmistakably human.
Man of Sorrows by Pietro Perugino
Where Bellini’s painting invites intimacy, Pietro Perugino’s Man of Sorrows presents a more reserved presence. Painted in 1495, the work originally crowned a massive altarpiece commissioned by the Decemviri, the ten magistrates who governed the city of Perugia. Positioned high above the altar, the image would have looked down on both civic leaders and worshippers alike.
Unlike Bellini’s crowded scene, Perugino’s composition is stark and controlled. Christ is alone, rising from the tomb before a plain black background. His body is still, almost symmetrical, and framed by a band of blue within the gold border.
The image once functioned as a powerful visual reminder of Christ’s sacrifice during the Catholic Mass. As the exhibit’s curator Dr. Marciari explained, during the most sacred moment of the service, the priest lifts the consecrated host above his head. The gesture echoes the raised body of Christ depicted in the painting when it hung above a church’s altar. “There’s this resonance between the dead body of Christ in the picture and the host being lifted during the Mass,” Dr. Marciari said. The painting was meant to reinforce that spiritual moment for the congregation below.

Today, removed from its original altarpiece and displayed just above eye level in a museum gallery, the painting reads differently. This stark composition nearly feels modern. The plain black background isolates Christ, focusing attention on the quiet tension in his body and the stillness of the scene.
“The darkness and stillness are so powerful that the gallery feels almost frozen in time,” said Sadie O’Connell ’28. “It makes the sorrow in the painting feel personal, like it could happen to anyone.” Her reaction echoes what many visitors feel when confronting Perugino’s Man of Sorrows. Viewing the painting is a meditative experience that stands in contrast to Bellini’s intimate human tenderness.
Mr. Giorgis-Blessent notes that the darkness also serves as a reference to the Biblical account of Christ’s death. According to the Gospel narrative, the sky darkened at the moment of the crucifixion. “It gives the impression of night, a long night of sorrow, waiting for the resurrection,” he said.
Where Bellini’s work emphasizes human tenderness, Perugino’s painting feels more symbolic; it is an image designed for spiritual reflection. Yet both works reflect the same Renaissance impulse — to make the sacred palpable.
A Conversation Across Five Centuries
What makes this pairing at the Morgan Library so remarkable is that the two paintings were never meant to meet. In fifteenth-century Italy, the salt-tinged air of Venice and the fortress-like hill city of Perugia were worlds apart. Artists often spent their entire lives within a single city-state, rarely encountering the work of contemporaries in other parts of Italy.
Today, however, the two masterpieces face each other from across Pierpont Morgan’s Study. Their meeting was more accidental than arranged. Bellini’s Pietà arrived after a major restoration funded by the organization Venetian Heritage. Perugino’s Man of Sorrows followed only weeks before the exhibition opened, offered through a cultural initiative from the region of Umbria. “It looks like brilliant planning,” Dr. Marciari said with a laugh, “but to be perfectly honest, it just sort of happened.”
Placed side by side, the paintings reveal two distinct answers to the same question: how to represent suffering and the divine. Bellini creates an emotional scene filled with physical detail. Perugino offers a more formal vision, one that is orderly, still, and almost architectural.
For Renaissance viewers, paintings like these carried profound spiritual symbolism, shaping devotion and reflection. They were not yet museum pieces but active participants in daily life – objects that guided prayer, shaped rituals, and reinforced civic identity.
Modern audiences approach them differently. Most visitors to the Morgan Library do not kneel before Bellini’s Christ or contemplate Perugino’s figure during Mass. Instead, they study the paintings’ brushwork, composition, and historical context. “Our interest today is primarily artistic rather than religious,” Marciari explained, “but the details still make the images feel real – the blood running down Christ’s arm, and the way that the angels lift the body.”
The atmosphere of the exhibition extends beyond the paintings themselves. The historic rooms preserve much of J. Pierpont Morgan’s original collection, with furniture, shelves, and decor remaining as he arranged them. Stained-glass windows filter soft light across deep red walls and velvet furnishings, while towering shelves of rare books rise toward the ceiling. As people wander slowly through the space, the exhibition feels less like a temporary display and more like a preserved world where art, devotion, and history overlap.
These are not Renaissance ideals alone. Mr. Giorgis-Blessent described his own response to Bellini’s painting as a moment of meditation. “You feel the pain,” he said. “It reminds you of the suffering everyone has to endure in life.” That shared humanity may be why these works still resonate in a bustling city thousands of miles from where they were created.
Outside the Morgan Library, Midtown Manhattan moves at full speed – subway trains rattle underground, taxis honk along Madison Avenue, and crowds rush through intersections.
Inside the gallery, time feels like it slows down. Two paintings from the fifteenth century hang only a few feet apart, inviting modern viewers into a conversation that began more than five hundred years ago. For a moment, the distance between Renaissance Italy and contemporary New York City disappears. Though the fragile human face of suffering — painted centuries ago with oil on wood — still feels remarkably close.
Placed side by side, the paintings reveal two distinct answers to the same question: how to represent suffering and the divine. Bellini creates an emotional scene filled with physical detail. Perugino offers a more formal vision, one that is orderly, still, and almost architectural.
